[Cosmetic injectables in dental practice: legal aspects in the Netherlands]. / Cosmetische injectables in de tandheelkundige praktijk: juridische aspecten in Nederland.

A recent survey indicates 49% of this journal's subscribers endorse the administration of cosmetic injectables by properly trained dentists. Given the surging demand for cosmetic treatments, it's essential to establish clear guidelines and conventions defining the roles of the various healthcare professionals in various situations. There is, however, considerable discussion still and from a legal standpoint, the role of dentists within cosmetic medicine remains ambiguous. Under the Dutch Individual Healthcare Professions Act (Wet BIG), dentists are authorized to administer cosmetic injectables exclusively for dental purposes. However, based on the content of current dental training, one might argue that dentists' authorization could be extended to include facial injectable treatments in the entire face, in future. Presently, it is prudent for general practice dentists to abstain from cosmetic procedures with cosmetic injectables without a specific (aesthetic) dental objective.

[Cosmetic facial surgery: a bird's eye view]. / Cosmetische aangezichtschirurgie in vogelvlucht.

Surgical procedures that rejuvenate and/or harmonize the face are known for their long-lasting and clinically relevant positive effects on the psychological well-being and quality of life of the client. Despite the popularity of cosmetic injectables, facelift surgery remains the most powerful and durable treatment for restoring aging symptoms, especially in the female face. Skin correction of the upper eyelids is the most commonly performed aesthetic facial surgery. This article provides an overview of the most important cosmetic surgical procedures for the face, focusing on the facelift, neck lift, forehead lift, upper and lower eyelid correction, subnasal lip lift and rhinoplasty. The indications, contraindications, treatment techniques, advantages and disadvantages are explained. Due to the increasing demand for cosmetic treatments, it is important that dentists and oral and maxillofacial surgeons have knowledge of these procedures in order to provide optimal information, referral or treatment when desired.

[What is 'botox', what are fillers, and how safe are these cosmetic injectables?] / Wat is 'botox', wat zijn fillers en hoe veilig zijn deze cosmetische injectables nu eigenlijk?

Botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A, popularly referred to as 'botox') is a muscle-relaxant that is injected into the mimic facial muscles to soften wrinkles in more than two percent of Dutch women annually. A similar number of women undergo filler injections with hyaluronic acid hydrogels, used to counteract the aging appearance of the skin, or to create desired facial contours. Complications are generally mild in nature and rare (certainly compared to surgical complication rates) and include nodules, bumps and a temporary heavy feeling of the eyebrows. Vascular complications related to filler injections (1:7000) can potentially lead to unilateral blindness or skin necrosis. In the Netherlands, the risk of blindness over the past six years is estimated to be 1 in every 1.4 million filler injections. Permanent skin damage due to gangrene has never been reported in the Netherlands. In conclusion, BoNT-A and hyaluronic acid filler injections are safe procedures in the hands of appropriately trained healthcare professionals.

[Vascular occlusion following profile harmonization of the chin with hyaluronic acid fillers]. / Vasculaire occlusie na profielharmonisatie van de kin met hyaluronzuur fillers.

The use of dermal fillers for cosmetic procedures has increased rapidly both worldwide and in the Netherlands in recent years, which has led to an absolute increase in reported side effects and complications. Although most of these complications are mild, serious complications such as vascular occlusion can also occur. In this article, we describe a case of a 35-year-old woman who showed signs of reduced tissue perfusion and the early stage of skin necrosis following injection of hyaluronic acid fillers in the chin. This complication was successfully treated by ultrasound-guided injection of hyaluronidase, resulting in a full recovery without residual symptoms. To minimize the risk of serious complications treatment with hyaluronic acid fillers should be carried out by an experienced practitioner.

[Treatment with botulinum toxin of masseter hypertrophy, myalgia of the tendons and attrition induced by bruxism]. / Behandeling van bruxismegeïnduceerde masseterhypertrofie, tendomyalgie en attritie met botulinetoxine.

Bruxism is a disabling condition in which unconscious contractions of the masticulatory muscles lead to teeth grinding and jaw clenching. Symptoms include toothache, temporomandibular dysfunction, headache and attrition. Treatment options range from conservative approaches to invasive interventions. Education, stress reduction, avoidance of stimulants, and relaxation techniques can help in mild cases. Wearing an occlusal splint can reduce attrition. Botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) injections are a treatment option temporarily causing partial paralysis of the masticulatory muscles. BoNT-A is a treatment for reducing symptoms and improving the quality of life of patients with bruxism that has been proven safe and effective. The effects usually last several months. To achieve the best results and minimize side effects, BoNT-A injections should be applied by an experienced practitioner.

[Towards perfection: the ethical downside of the ideal of beauty]. / Op weg naar perfectie: de ethische keerzijde van het schoonheidsideaal.

Beauty, it seems, is a fascination inherent in human nature. Research shows that an attractive face plays a significant factor in human life, such as in the areas of appreciation and judgment.The growing demand for cosmetic treatments is amplified by social media and influencer marketing. However, there are possible negative effects, such as addiction and dissatisfaction with treatment outcome in people with Body Dysmorphic Disorder. It remains important to recognize that risks are inherent in medical procedures.

[Ocular complications of local anaesthesia in dentistry]. / Oculaire bijwerkingen van lokale anesthesie in de tandheelkunde.

An estimated 1 in 1,000 local anaesthetic injections in the maxilla or the mandible lead to unwanted effects on the ipsilateral eye. We have seen a case with diplopia and lateral rectus palsy following bimaxillary anaesthesia. A systematic literature review of reports on this type of complication resulted in a total of 144 documented cases published between 1936 and 2016. The most frequently reported symptoms included diplopia (72%), partial or full ophthalmoplegia (26%), ptosis (22%), mydriasis (18%), amaurosis (13%) and orbital pain (12%). This type of complication is best understood by pathophysiological hypotheses that include intra-arterial injection, intravenous injection, autonomic dysregulation, or deep injection and diffusion. If ocular symptoms appear after local intraoral anaesthesia, the patient should be reassured. In the case of diplopia, the eye should be covered with a gauze dressing, and the patient should be instructed about associated safety risks. If symptoms persist or when vision deteriorates, referral to an ophthalmologist is advisable.

Bad splits in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: systematic review of fracture patterns.

An unfavourable and unanticipated pattern of the mandibular sagittal split osteotomy is generally referred to as a 'bad split'. Few restorative techniques to manage the situation have been described. In this article, a classification of reported bad split pattern types is proposed and appropriate salvage procedures to manage the different types of undesired fracture are presented. A systematic review was undertaken, yielding a total of 33 studies published between 1971 and 2015. These reported a total of 458 cases of bad splits among 19,527 sagittal ramus osteotomies in 10,271 patients. The total reported incidence of bad split was 2.3% of sagittal splits. The most frequently encountered were buccal plate fractures of the proximal segment (types 1A-F) and lingual fractures of the distal segment (types 2A and 2B). Coronoid fractures (type 3) and condylar neck fractures (type 4) have seldom been reported. The various types of bad split may require different salvage approaches.

Bad splits in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of reported risk factors.

An unfavourable and unanticipated pattern of the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) is generally referred to as a 'bad split'. Patient factors predictive of a bad split reported in the literature are controversial. Suggested risk factors are reviewed in this article. A systematic review was undertaken, yielding a total of 30 studies published between 1971 and 2015 reporting the incidence of bad split and patient age, and/or surgical technique employed, and/or the presence of third molars. These included 22 retrospective cohort studies, six prospective cohort studies, one matched-pair analysis, and one case series. Spearman's rank correlation showed a statistically significant but weak correlation between increasing average age and increasing occurrence of bad splits in 18 studies (ρ=0.229; P<0.01). No comparative studies were found that assessed the incidence of bad split among the different splitting techniques. A meta-analysis pooling the effect sizes of seven cohort studies showed no significant difference in the incidence of bad split between cohorts of patients with third molars present and concomitantly removed during surgery, and patients in whom third molars were removed at least 6 months preoperatively (odds ratio 1.16, 95% confidence interval 0.73-1.85, Z=0.64, P=0.52). In summary, there is no robust evidence to date to show that any risk factor influences the incidence of bad split.

Controversies in orbital reconstruction-III. Biomaterials for orbital reconstruction: a review with clinical recommendations.

The goal of orbital reconstruction is to repair trauma defects, to correct the position of the eye anatomically, avoiding enophthalmos, and to restore ocular function. For the reconstruction of (trauma) defects, many surgeons recommend materials that can be bent into an anatomical shape and that possess the properties of radiopacity and long-term stability. However, apart from these desired properties, the ideal material for orbital reconstruction remains controversial. Autologous bone is often mentioned as the 'gold standard,' likely because of its mechanical properties, revascularization potential, and its adaptation to the orbital tissue with minimal acute and chronic immune reactivity. However, autologous bone can show unpredictable resorption rates and suboptimal volume correction. In recent years, an increasing interest in the use of alloplasts for orbital reconstruction has become apparent in the literature. Modern technological advantages, such as preoperative planning, navigation, and perioperative imaging, can be beneficial in the decision to choose a certain implant. The aim of this review is to give a comprehensive overview of the advantages and disadvantages of materials used to reconstruct traumatic orbital defects and to provide a practical, evidence-based, complexity-driven set of guidelines.

Controversies in orbital reconstruction--I. Defect-driven orbital reconstruction: a systematic review.

In the 1980s, computed tomography was introduced as an imaging modality for diagnosing orbital fractures. Since then, new light has been shed on the field of orbital fracture management. Currently, most surgeons are likely to repair orbital fractures based on clinical findings and particularly on data obtained from computed tomography scans. However, an important but unresolved issue is the fracture size, which dictates the extent and type of reconstruction. In other fields of trauma surgery, an increasing body of evidence is stressing the importance of complexity-based treatment models. The aim of this study was to systematically review all articles on orbital reconstruction, with a focus on the indication for surgery and the defect size and location, in order to identify the reconstruction methods that show the best results for the different types of orbital fractures.

Controversies in orbital reconstruction--II. Timing of post-traumatic orbital reconstruction: a systematic review.

The timing of orbital reconstruction is a determinative factor with respect to the incidence of potential postoperative orbital complications. In orbital trauma surgery, a general distinction is made between immediate (within hours), early (within 2 weeks), and late surgical intervention. There is a strong consensus on the indications for immediate repair, but clinicians face challenges in identifying patients with minimal defects who may actually benefit from delayed surgical treatment. Moreover, controversies exist regarding the risk of late surgery-related orbital fibrosis, since traumatic ocular motility disorders sometimes recover spontaneously and therefore do not necessarily require surgery. In this study, all currently available evidence on timing as an independent variable in orbital fracture reduction outcomes for paediatric and adult patients was systematically reviewed. Current evidence supports guidelines for immediate repair but is insufficient to support guidelines on the best timing for non-immediate orbital reconstruction.

[Psychological aspects of orthognathic surgery]. / Psychologische aspecten van een kaakstandcorrectie.

Corrective jaw surgery, for patients with malocclusion and dysgnathia, is primarily performed to rehabilitate oral functions. However, the patients' motivation for orthognathic surgery often seems to be influenced as well by the desire for aesthetic correction of a facial anomaly. Preoperative screening for psychiatric problems such as body dysmorphic disorder is requisite. The majority of orthognathic patients experience a negative influence of their appearance on their psychosocial well-being. In addition, the hope for aesthetic improvement is not seldom an important incentive for visiting an oral and maxillofacial surgeon. In the literature, in addition to a positive effect of corrective jaw surgery on the patient's perceived appearance, an associated improvement in quality of life is described. Correction of a disharmonious face is at least as important to patients as oral function recovery.